|
|
| Author |
Message |
mrblanche Jammin' Hot

Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:14 am Post subject: Set-neck versus bolt-on? |
|
|
I'm comparing the Fender Showmaster to the Ibanez RG320. The Fender has a set neck, and the Ibanez has a bolt-on, although Ibanez does make some others with set necks.
Can anyone give me any feedback on the advantages/disadvantages of each, as well as some opinion on the two guitars?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can only say, as a bass player, that the bolt-neck seems to be brighter with more emphasis on initial attack and decays quicker. A thru-neck has a wider envelope. Proper guitarists will come in with more useful ops, but that's my opening coupla pfennigs...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lee_UK Rolling Stone No.8

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 3386 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you have potted the black on the first try Bass, your observations are as usual, spot on. But then of course you could go on to the differences between the maple and the mahogany... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrblanche Jammin' Hot

Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do go on about the difference! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, mock the pleasant plucker, you six-stringers . HST, I might be a root-picking, one-string-at-a-time man, but wait a second.
Putting to one side the obvious, in order of importance:
1) Pups and electronics
2) Body and neck woods
3) Ancillary stuff like bolt-on, set-neck, neck-thru, truss rod adjuster at the heel or the headstock
I had a look at that Fender Showmaster:
and I thought "Whadda?"
The only point of a flame maple top (it makes no difference to tone) is that it looks pretty. It looks pretty if it's bookmatched. What the perfooey is that top from Fender? I got a better job from laying down a laminate floor in my bathroom. A bookmatched flame maple is pretty simple; saw down the middle and lay the two halves flat. The Fender looks like a couple of slabs in the warehouse stuck together. A real candidate for the "worst finish" thread. For the money they're asking, I wouldn't touch one unless it just happened to even up. The random I've posted from a guitar seller looks blimmin' ghastly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lee_UK Rolling Stone No.8

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 3386 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whats slightly worrying is, that picture looks like a catalogue picture, so if that was the best they could find, what does the worst look like? maybe they are made in China where they havent quite grasped the concept of bookmatching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1184 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think what they're trying to say is go for the Ibanez, and for my bit, get it in Gunmetal, they look cool (well, apart from the trademark 'Axe of Cheese' looks) at least it doesn't have a monkey-grip! And that Fender is B-ugly
Tim. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Basswood body on the Ibanez, though - not my favourite wood. It's not a tone thing, it's just that basswood dings so easily. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrblanche Jammin' Hot

Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, what I actually did was bought an Ibanez SA160QMAH. That's the quilted maple, amber finish.
I believe it has a mahogony body... I wonder if it's one piece, or 3 or more pieces like most Fender bodies? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blanche, I had a look and is this yours - the QMAM?
the 160QH is a sunburst ash-body. Either way, I reckon you've chosen a better guitar than either of the first two you mentioned (WARNING! humble bass player opinion )
The HSS pickups should be quite versatile (is that a rotary selector?) compared with the twin HBs, and the wood looks better. I doubt if it is one-piece mahogany (flip it over and have a good look) but I wouldn't worry if it's not. One-piece costs more and it only matters to those who think less glue = better tone (darned if I can tell).
Structurally, a three-piece core body capped with a two-piece maple is very strong. Rather like a brick wall; the mortar doesn't sit on the same line. Again, the three-piece maple neck is a good thing if (and I'm sure it has) it's lined up properly with opposing grain.
Good pick of guitar, IMHO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|