Home | News | Guitar Lessons | Guitar Database | Discussion | Bands | Guitars | Top Amps | TAB | Stores | Search | Contact | Hitsquad
  :: Register :: Log in :: Archive :: Old Forum :: FAQ :: Search :: Usergroups :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages


Set-neck versus bolt-on?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarSite.com Guitar Discussion Forum Index -> Guitar
Author Message
mrblanche
Jammin' Hot
Jammin' Hot


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:14 am    Post subject: Set-neck versus bolt-on? Reply with quote

I'm comparing the Fender Showmaster to the Ibanez RG320. The Fender has a set neck, and the Ibanez has a bolt-on, although Ibanez does make some others with set necks.

Can anyone give me any feedback on the advantages/disadvantages of each, as well as some opinion on the two guitars?

Thanks.
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can only say, as a bass player, that the bolt-neck seems to be brighter with more emphasis on initial attack and decays quicker. A thru-neck has a wider envelope. Proper guitarists will come in with more useful ops, but that's my opening coupla pfennigs... Smile
Back to top
lee_UK
Rolling Stone No.8
Rolling Stone No.8


Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 3386
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you have potted the black on the first try Bass, your observations are as usual, spot on. But then of course you could go on to the differences between the maple and the mahogany...
Back to top
mrblanche
Jammin' Hot
Jammin' Hot


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do go on about the difference!
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, mock the pleasant plucker, you six-stringers Smile . HST, I might be a root-picking, one-string-at-a-time man, but wait a second.

Putting to one side the obvious, in order of importance:
1) Pups and electronics
2) Body and neck woods
3) Ancillary stuff like bolt-on, set-neck, neck-thru, truss rod adjuster at the heel or the headstock

I had a look at that Fender Showmaster:


and I thought "Whadda?"

The only point of a flame maple top (it makes no difference to tone) is that it looks pretty. It looks pretty if it's bookmatched. What the perfooey is that top from Fender? I got a better job from laying down a laminate floor in my bathroom. A bookmatched flame maple is pretty simple; saw down the middle and lay the two halves flat. The Fender looks like a couple of slabs in the warehouse stuck together. A real candidate for the "worst finish" thread. For the money they're asking, I wouldn't touch one unless it just happened to even up. The random I've posted from a guitar seller looks blimmin' ghastly.
Back to top
lee_UK
Rolling Stone No.8
Rolling Stone No.8


Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 3386
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whats slightly worrying is, that picture looks like a catalogue picture, so if that was the best they could find, what does the worst look like? maybe they are made in China where they havent quite grasped the concept of bookmatching.
Back to top
Tim
Low Frequency Out
Low Frequency Out


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 1184
Location: Probably at the bar.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think what they're trying to say is go for the Ibanez, and for my bit, get it in Gunmetal, they look cool (well, apart from the trademark 'Axe of Cheese' looks) at least it doesn't have a monkey-grip! And that Fender is B-ugly

Tim.
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Basswood body on the Ibanez, though - not my favourite wood. It's not a tone thing, it's just that basswood dings so easily.
Back to top
mrblanche
Jammin' Hot
Jammin' Hot


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, what I actually did was bought an Ibanez SA160QMAH. That's the quilted maple, amber finish.

I believe it has a mahogony body... I wonder if it's one piece, or 3 or more pieces like most Fender bodies?
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blanche, I had a look and is this yours - the QMAM?



the 160QH is a sunburst ash-body. Either way, I reckon you've chosen a better guitar than either of the first two you mentioned (WARNING! humble bass player opinion Smile )

The HSS pickups should be quite versatile (is that a rotary selector?) compared with the twin HBs, and the wood looks better. I doubt if it is one-piece mahogany (flip it over and have a good look) but I wouldn't worry if it's not. One-piece costs more and it only matters to those who think less glue = better tone (darned if I can tell).

Structurally, a three-piece core body capped with a two-piece maple is very strong. Rather like a brick wall; the mortar doesn't sit on the same line. Again, the three-piece maple neck is a good thing if (and I'm sure it has) it's lined up properly with opposing grain.

Good pick of guitar, IMHO.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarSite.com Guitar Discussion Forum Index -> Guitar All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 



Can't post? Make sure you Register or log in.

Forum Home :: Archive :: Old Forum :: GuitarSite.com :: 2000 Guitars Database :: Bands :: Guitars