Home | News | Guitar Lessons | Guitar Database | Discussion | Bands | Guitars | Top Amps | TAB | Stores | Search | Contact | Hitsquad
  :: Register :: Log in :: Archive :: Old Forum :: FAQ :: Search :: Usergroups :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages


Gibson RD Artist/Standard 1970's/80's Basses
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarSite.com Guitar Discussion Forum Index -> Bass Guitar
Author Message
mackflynn
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the tips, I'll be sure to check everything out you said.
Back to top
evilLordJuju



Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:03 am    Post subject: RD basses Reply with quote

RD basses are great. they are a little different from the older Gibson EB and Thunderbirds in that they have solid maple body and neck. Still a glue in neck though - typical Gibson. The standard is passive, the Artist all active. Solid body Gibsons were usually mahogany until the Grabber/Ripper/G3 series came along, and this is the first active Gibson bass. The compression / expansion circuitry is all quite interesting,

Very big and heavy, but with a terrific range of sound. I prefer the Artist to the Standard. You can get super bass, to super treble and anywhere in between. I play it live more than most of my other Gibsons because of this flexability

And yeah, they really do look cool
You can see some info on these basses here
Gibson RD artist bass Gibson RD standard bass
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juju, thanks for the opinion and also the link to the Gibsonbass site. That was a handy ref for the RD Artist, although it's a pity the audio clips used such a limp preamp (TBF, my USB speakers aren't all that good). It sounds like a versatile bass, although a bit more "oomph" in the recording level would have made it a bit clearer. If I were being picky about the RD, I'd say that the black/ebony looks better than the natural/maple (which reminds me of some of Gibsons cheaper lines).
Back to top
mackflynn
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SICK. Yeah black is definately best.

I found those audio clips. Same deal. The recording quality was shit, and didn't give me a good enough idea what it sounds like. But still helpful.

And yah, the ebony artist is the way to go.
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saved me from ditching my USB speakers, Mack Smile Although, given that even Connie's "Welcome to AOL" sounded clearer than those audio clips, I had a feeling that it wasn't my little cones that were the problem Laughing

Must say, that black/ebony Artist looks proper droolworthy and it's nice to see a bass that doesn't look like yet another Prec/Jazz stylee or (worse) one of those "upper horn glued all the way up to 9th fret" moderns.
Back to top
mackflynn
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couldn't agree more.
Back to top
mackflynn
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Finally got a chance to look at that Jim Reed site. For some reason, the last little while (after you sent me the link) i couldn't get into it, and find the BE4 or 5. I just cruised back to this forum, and thought i'd try again.

I must say, its a beautiful bass. Actaully its very similar to the Washburn T24, as far as looks go. But that could be it. I've found myself looking closely at that bass recently, also. The double J pickups in the T24 are a bit of a worry though.

The Jim Reed BE4 looks like a jem though, and the right types of pups on it. Course, you mentioned the Kramers were a bit of a set back. I know vertually nothing about kramer pups (actually, i know little about pickups in general), so i'd probably be unaware of their flaws. But for information sake, what kind (or kinds) would YOU suggest replacing them (or one) with instead. What are the disadvantages of the Kramers.

(sorry more questions to come:)

Also, can you comment on the playability/action on it? I know we've talked about keeping the low end blues/jazz tone, which I want... but i find myself in the annoying position of wanting that AND fast action. Will I be able to play 16th's at 120bpm, (or w/e our last rediculous song requires) on it? So many basses I've played just can't seem to handle the speed without the fret noise. (Maybe im just a lousy player, who knows)

Anyway, NICE!!!! looking bass, and I would like to know more! Very Happy
Back to top
1bassleft
Lowdown Cack-hander
Lowdown Cack-hander


Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 3951
Location: "Hit The North"

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mack, I've got to run off the cyberPC but, in the meantime, have a read (I've just spotted an awful pun that I won't commit) on the BE5 that I put in Harmony Central's user reviews. There's a mistake I made about the ease with which the treble boost/cut can be altered (it can't), but otherwise I covered the details. The action is very good, straight out of the box. Pups are standard EMG40 sized. Bartolini also make this size of pup.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    GuitarSite.com Guitar Discussion Forum Index -> Bass Guitar All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 



Can't post? Make sure you Register or log in.

Forum Home :: Archive :: Old Forum :: GuitarSite.com :: 2000 Guitars Database :: Bands :: Guitars