|
|
| Author |
Message |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, here's one, Tim:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Bass-guitar-kay-vintage_W0QQitemZ7397830923QQcategoryZ4713QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
My very,very first ever bass was a Kay 4001 "copy" (if I can dignify it with that term). Almost as nasty as this, except the strings did at least go over the pole pieces and the fretboard. It was in "Woolworths" when I was 13, for £45 but I accidentally damaged it just by picking it up. I quickly put it back and, a week later, saw it was reduced to £17. I bought it, but any feelings of guilt quickly evaporated once I tried it. Easily the worst ever guitar to land in my hands. Like this one, the neck wasn't even maple. Bizarre as it sounds, it looks a heckuva lot like beech
It was a shortscale, with flats and it managed to put me off both for decades. I've just now bought a Fender Mustang Bass basketcase that I shall restore to something like its 30" glory (with flats), but I don't really get on with them. They 'flobble' a lot when hit hard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's the Issue, I can Flobble a long-scale if I'm not careful but a combination of lowered action and not going through a compressor is slowly transforming my plucking hand...
And randomly, on Friday, (this one time, at band camp...) I started playing finger-style, although 4-5 mins of straight 8ths was all my little digits could cope with, they retired soon after and refused to move in any rythmical way.
But yeah, I want to try that short-scale hitting-deep-mud-with-a-big-stick sound |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, and thatmust be an absolute bitch to play, the over head shot shows the G just about over the board, then swap to the 3/4 side shot, that must have an action of 10mm at least!
I like the headstock shot, 'look this really is, a no-name peice of crud' At least they din't go down the 'it's old so Buy-it-now-for-£1000 route |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
, some do. It surprises me what some of those '80s Kays and suchlike will fetch. I mean, there's nostalgia but who gets nostalgic about the Nit Nurse? Worst bass ever by a continent; binned somewhere, forgotten and hopefully never to be revisited. My "Ric" had exactly the same bridge cover. Screw down the middle and a non-fire resistant foam mute. The likelihood of me playing that thing so fast as to burn synthetics was a non-issue anyway.
Are you mostly a plecker, Tim? I had you down as a more "classic" bass player. I'm an awful fingerer, I really am. I use the technique more now with the change in music style but, if I'm honest, I rake and generally side-step doing it properly. I once had to learn that Cass Lewis line properly and it nearly killed me. The great thing about a forum is that I could hide my identity and pretend I'm a 4-string fretboard killer, but the reality is I am definitely not. Just good enough to impress guitarists  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Always been purely plec but like I say I'm experimenting with everything at the minute. I've always played very rythmically, not much happening with the fretting hand but lots of muting, rests, ghosts, off-the-beat (intentionally ) stuff with my picking hand. I've never been that good at bass really but getting much better now since I conciously decided to learn and practice. Writing is coming together to, now that it's backed up with a tiny bit of theory, got me over the 4/4 root note approach at least. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slight change of plan: a Gibson SG-Z
http://www.gibsonbass.com/SGZ.php
In 'Ebony' of course.
Although I don't like the lack of a neck p-up...maybe go for an EB-3 after all as I malnly use the neck p-up and just add a bit of bridge for punch. Thus rendering this post obsolete as I've already said I like the EB-3, act like I'm not here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
, I'm surprised that Gibson tried four years of flogging that thing. OK, it's an SG body, which is nice, but everything else is all wrong, wrong, wrong. As you mention, the two soaps are too close together (for the sake of a pretty scratchplate?), but Gibson are by no means the only maker to stick two soaps in like that. From my own experience, it makes pup selection a waste of time; the tonal difference is minimal. How come Leo Fender is one of the few people to realize there is a science to pup placement?
I'm not sure I see the point of individual wiring switches. Choose one pup to have a noticeably weedier output? Or one of them to hum and the other doesn't? Much better to have a global serial/parallel/single flicker and the SC choice could use the two pups opposite polarity coils to maintain hum cancelling. G+L's L2500 (a runner-up for my top three) makes much better use of the mini-throwers.
The single biggest reason I wouldn't have the SG-Z, though, is its complete lack of balance. You can't just stick a bass neck on a guitar-sized body and expect it to work. I found this out when I toyed with a P neck to a Jazzmaster style of body. Not only does it look odd (look again at the SG-Z; it just looks odd) but all nicely balancing basses have the upper strap horn roughly where the 12th fret is. Look at a Precision, Jazz and countless others and you'll see. Now, this SG-z has the upper horn about where the 17th fret is. Worse, the strap button is on the back of the neck about where the 20th is (despite the Gibson press release, this is a 20-fret bass).
The Thunderbird is a bit head-heavy, but this one must smack the headstock on the stage floor as soon as released by the fretting hand. How fast can you play if your hand is effectively supporting the weight of the neck? I also think the cosmetic issues of the hardware are not great. Black mini-keys on a SG?
If any SG-z owner looks in and reads this, I'd be interested in your comments. I've never played one, so I could be completely wrong. It doesn't look right, though. It looks like a design/marketing dept idea that just wasn't thought through. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aesthetically I have to disagree, I love the look of all the SG style basses but totally agree on the issue of balance I have a bass with that shape of body and the strap button right by the neckplate, hardly ever played it for that very reason.
I really don't like the look of a long top horn but mine does look (not to mention hang/pivot etc) much better since I put the strap button on the front of the horn, I also moved the rear strap button up about 3" to the the begining of the 'shoulder' of the body, much more comfortable now.
Another good arguement for not buying prestige or vintage, you wouldn't mod them with a Black and Decker would you?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1bassleft Lowdown Cack-hander

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 3951 Location: "Hit The North"
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glad to report we're not disagreeing, Tim
I think the SG body looks great. I was just arguing that this 34.5" scale neck (the EB, as you know, is 30.5") throws all the proportions out, and the balance goes with it. As you've found, relocating strap buttons on the butt and to the top horn can sort this out. IIRC, it used to be possible to buy some strap button extender for Thunderbird basses. An ugly rod of steel about 3" long. It avoided drilling any holes, but looked about as cool as those fluorescent yellow shoulder straps for motorcyclists  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Low Frequency Out

Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Probably at the bar.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I insist, we ARE disagreeing...I like the SG body with the long neck, it looks kick-ass, until you stand up and snap the headstock off on the floor!
The mods mentioned were actually made to my Aria...the SG shaped bass sacrificed it's inards to a school project, although I still fantasise about what it would sould like with some decent electrics plonked in there as it looks the B's
I've seen those extender thingys...hmm it's a bit like admitting your design doesn't work practically, despite looking pretty (trust me, I've been there!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|