or me [and everyone who’s ever looked at it] could be totally totally wrong and it could be a legit epiphone.

i’ve found an epi fat 310 that was made in indonesia in the 90s/00s and is a strat copy.

it’s not the same guitar [these things came in hbss and mine is hb-hb], plus mine has a more advanced tuning system, it was made in japan [apparently….?], and there’s no serial number on the backplate. but, if epiphone made a strat copy from indonesia in 2000, maybe there’s little reason to think they weren’t making strat copies in japan some time between 1970 and 1985.

meaning, maybe it is a real epi after all, and i’ve accomplished nothing. ________ [URL=http://www.ford-wiki.com/wiki/Jaguar_XF]JAGUAR XF[/URL]

glw is right – there was a typo in the original post. it’s c 1970-1985. 1986, i think, to be technical.

some more research into the guitar has led me to believe that it may be possible that the body was made in japan, and not necessarily the neck. the metal plate is actually not located on the neck, and could have come from the guitar, or even from a spare metal plate that was hanging about. it’s there to cover the bolt-on job.

although the more i look at it, the bolted metal plate may have actually been to reinforce. the neck may have been glued on first as there’s a bit of residue.

there’s no chance that i’m unscrewing it to find out.

the neck would more or less be either a c. 1965 american made coronet/wiltshire/etc neck or a 199x korean made reissue, although i’ve been unable to locate an actual picture of a korean made reissue with the logo in the same place.

the logic behind this is that (to my knowledge) epiphone did not make batwing necks like this while they were making guitars in japan, only before they moved to japan and after they moved to korea when they reissued a number of models from their pre-japanese days.

hence, this guitar is definately a frankenstein, probably with a very old neck and a completely unidentifiable body, other than that it’s some kind of strat-like body with an input jack where an sg’s should be, and sg-positioned humbuckers.

i’ve been arguing with a few online appraisers that can’t grasp why anybody would put such an old neck on such a body, as that doesn’t make any sense from a reseller’s standpoint. the bluebook guy [zach whatever] thinks somebody put a decal on it – which is not impossible, and would be about the only answer if a guitar is just a piece of furniture with no value other than it’s resale value. the decal would be to boost the price from that of an aria to that of an epiphone, or maybe to trick somebody into thinking it’s older than it is.

but, from a player’s standpoint, it’s not that absurd to think that somebody wanted a guitar that was shaped like a strat and had an sg/paul-like neck and pickups put in. if you want a strat shaped guitar with a gibson neck, there’s no other option but to build it yourself. and anyone who plays guitar can absolutely understand why a strat shaped guitar with a gibson neck may be appealing!

if it’s an old neck and not a reissue, then the tuning heads were unquestionably redone at some point, which makes perfect sense if the guy spent enough time on it to swap the neck, change the pickups and possibly even to redrill the input jack.

i never got any kind of serious response from anybody, only a lot of vague guesses that i don’t think really make sense. the only thing i’m convinced of is that the guitar was probably put together from parts by a rather talented tech who wanted to put together a half decent guitar [possibly for his kid] for cheap, and that the neck is probably from an original coronet or an original wiltshire, despite the fact that this makes little sense from a reseller’s POV. ________ [URL=http://www.yamaha-tech.com/wiki/Yamaha_PSR-225]Psr-225[/URL]

but, from a player’s standpoint, it’s not that bizarre to think that somebody wanted a guitar that was shaped like a strat and had an sg/paul-like neck and pickups put in. if you want a strat shaped guitar with a gibson neck, there’s no other option but to build it yourself. and anyone who plays guitar can absolutely understand why a strat shaped guitar with a gibson neck may be appealing!

if it’s an old neck and not a reissue, then the tuning heads were unquestionably redone at some point, which makes perfect sense if the guy spent enough time on it to swap the neck, change the pickups and possibly even to redrill the input jack.

i never got any kind of serious response from anybody, only a lot of vague guesses that i don’t think really make sense. the only thing i’m convinced of is that the guitar was probably put together from parts by a rather talented tech who wanted to put together a half decent guitar [possibly for his kid] for a low price, and that the neck is probably from an original coronet or an original wiltshire, despite the fact that this makes little sense from a reseller’s POV. ________ [URL=http://vaporizers.net/silver-surfer-vaporizer]Buy silversurfer vaporizer[/URL]

glw is right – there was a typo in the original post. it’s c 1970-1985. 1986, i think, to be technical.

some more research into the guitar has led me to believe that it may be possible that the body was made in japan, and not necessarily the neck. the metal plate is actually not located on the neck, and could have come from the guitar, or even from a spare metal plate that was hanging about. it’s there to cover the bolt-on job.

although the more i look at it, the bolted metal plate may have actually been to reinforce. the neck may have been glued on first as there’s a bit of residue.

there’s no chance that i’m unscrewing it to find out.

the neck would more or less be either a c. 1965 american made coronet/wiltshire/etc neck or a 199x korean made reissue, although i’ve been unable to locate an actual picture of a korean made reissue with the logo in the same place.

the logic behind this is that (to my knowledge) epiphone did not make batwing necks like this while they were making guitars in japan, only before they moved to japan and after they moved to korea when they reissued a number of models from their pre-japanese days.

hence, this guitar is definately a frankenstein, probably with a very old neck and a completely unidentifiable body, other than that it’s some kind of strat-like body with an input jack where an sg’s should be, and sg-positioned humbuckers.

i’ve been arguing with a few online appraisers that can’t grasp why anybody would put such an old neck on such a body, as that doesn’t make any sense from a reseller’s standpoint. the bluebook guy [zach whatever] thinks somebody put a decal on it – which is not impossible, and would be about the only answer if a guitar is just a piece of furniture with no value other than it’s resale value. the decal would be to boost the price from that of an aria to that of an epiphone, or maybe to trick somebody into thinking it’s older than it is.

i’m getting an error when i add the last three paragraphs about a forbidden word that i can’t identify, so i’m going to post this now and the last three paragraphs in a few moments. ________ [URL=http://dispensaries.org/]California Dispensaries[/URL]